The New York v. Trump case has been a topic of intense scrutiny and debate. The prosecution’s case against former President Donald Trump has been met with skepticism, particularly from Robert Costello, a former legal adviser to Michael Cohen. Here are some key insights from Costello that shed light on the case:

1. Case Lacks Substance: According to Costello, the prosecution lacks substantial evidence that could potentially revive their case against Trump. He asserts that the case was “dead on arrival” and should have been dismissed by the judge.
2. Cohen’s Credibility Issues: Costello’s potential testimony could bring Cohen’s credibility issues to the forefront. This could significantly impact the case, as Cohen is a central figure in the prosecution’s strategy.
3. Potential Testimony: Costello believes that he should be called to testify. He argues that the grand jury did not receive all the necessary information for the case.
4. Juror Bias: Costello raises concerns about potential bias among the jurors. He suggests that some jurors might suffer from “Trump derangement syndrome,” which could influence their judgment.
5. Cohen’s Admission: Costello recounts a meeting with Cohen in April 2018, where Cohen admitted to contemplating suicide due to the legal problems he foresaw. This revelation could have significant implications for the case.
6. No Incriminating Information: Despite repeated urging, Cohen insisted that he had no incriminating information on Trump. This assertion could undermine the prosecution’s case if proven true.
7. Stormy Daniels NDA: Costello recalls Cohen stating that the NDA with Stormy Daniels was his idea. Cohen allegedly did not believe the allegations but wanted to avoid any potential embarrassment to Melania Trump
In conclusion, Costello’s insights provide a fresh perspective on the New York v. Trump case. His potential testimony and revelations about Cohen could significantly impact the case’s outcome. As the case unfolds, these insights will undoubtedly continue to fuel discussions and debates.






